Thursday, 6 August 2015

How the internet generation got politicized?


When I was an undergraduate student in the mid-2000s, politics was never a popular topic among my classmates. Political matters were hardly discussed, and even if they were, it happened without any great passion. When I moved to Bangalore for masters’ degree, I came in contact with students from all over the country. However, I didn’t see any noticeable change in attitude towards politics. Indeed, some people from older generations would often express dissatisfaction that the current generation does not care for the society or country, and are becoming hedonists addicted to TV, internet, cricket, fast food and sex.

All these changed quickly over the next couple of years. It was perhaps triggered by the Anna Hazare movement in April 2011. Although some political intellectuals derided it, there can be no doubt that it created a huge stir among urban youth- people of my generation or those a few years younger. Very quickly, people became aware of politics, politicians and the various scams they were indulging in. Some of the ministers in the central government had recently been implicated in major financial scams like CWG scam, 2G spectrum scam and coal scam, and this made the ruling party unpopular. The innumerable terrorist attacks and bomb blasts that had taken place in the 2005-08 period, as well as the Maoist strikes in April-May 2010 had created outrage among people- especially the middle class, and the ruling government was now seen as weak and ineffective. RaGa became a butt of ridicule. Much of this outrage was channelized through the internet, and it quite quickly made an impression on our internet-addicted generation. And the main opposition party- the IPP- quickly managed to seize control of the outrage. They offered a panacea called NaMo- an all-powerful  leader who would cure all the maladies of the ruling government. The internet generation is too young to remember NaMo’s shady past, and they readily fell for it. The result: a resounding victory for NaMo-led IPP in the 2014 general elections, along with the decimation of ruling party.

The young generation, specifically the 20-29 age groups today is a lot more politically aware than it was earlier. They are also angry and outraged. I understand their outrage, but not their anger. Most of them are very intolerant of opposing ideas, and look upon proponents of opposing ideas as traitors or enemies. Not all of them have the same set of ideas- maximum are broadly rightists, but leftists and centrists are also not negligible in number. But whatever the beliefs, these “politically-aware” people generally have very polarized 1-dimensional, black-and-white views. They quickly take sides on most issues. But the problems of the country are multi-dimensional, and there no side is black or white- rather there are different shades of grey. If people do not appreciate this fact, they can never hope to solve any problem. What has happened is a strange polarization in this young generation, along with a never-ending vitriolic, polemical rhetoric all over social media. All sides- from left to right- are guilty of such polemic, though right now the IPP followers are far ahead of everyone else in this regard. The top IPP leaders, as already mentioned, have cleverly outsourced the rhetoric to these people, through a few specialist rabble-rousing icons whom the internet generation can easily connect to- like the (in)famous Susu-Swamy. Anyone who feel that India should not be rapidly industrialized, anyone who don’t agree that Hindus are threatened in India, anyone who oppose harsh police activities in Kashmir, Manipur or in the red corridor are quickly labelled as traitors and anti-India. The other political parties have already been painted as anti-India, with varying degrees of success. This reminds me of a breed of “politically aware” people who abounded Kolkata in the eighties and nineties- who attributed everything wrong around them as “capitalist conspiracy”, “American conspiracy” or “Center’s negligence of our state”. Such people have dwindled in number now, but they still exist in isolated pockets. They are no less polemic than the right-wingers, only that their voices are not all-pervasive across the social media. If you somehow chance upon their “discussions”, on social media or elsewhere, you will realize that the anger, arrogance and intolerance is not limited to any party or ideology. 

And the intellectuals- scholars from various institutes, social workers, film-makers, non-mainstream journalists have not been able to stem the tide because they have not spoken a language which people can understand. They have espoused seemingly unpopular causes- farmer suicides, displacement due to industrialization, migration, environmental degradation, custodial deaths and disappearances- issues which those in power do not want to hear of. Their intentions are obviously noble, but they have not tried to understand the popular outrage, much less connect to the outraged and explain their causes. Nor have they offered plausible solutions to any problem. This has caused these people to be ridiculed and hated by most (though worshipped by a few, who in turn may hate the outraged majority!) Some of these intellectuals suffer from a syndrome called “blinded by ideology”- they may be so unreasonable that even those who could have sympathized with their causes, can be repelled away!

Yet another case worth examining is the role of NRIs. They are among the richest, most successful and visible people associated with India. They are also the most aggressively nationalist, and very keen to let the world know that they are so. They want the country to industrialize fast, and build a powerful military force necessarily with nuclear capability- so that the country is counted as among the most powerful ones in the world- alongside USA, China, Russia, Germany etc. They are particularly keen to overtake China. Such desires may stem from an inferiority complex they feel in the first-world countries, or due to real or perceived discrimination and arrogance they may face from the people there. On the other hand, they also feel a sense of guilt-they may be seen as people who have put self-interest above country’s interest and caused brain-drain, while their parents and grandparents may feel that they have abandoned their “traditions”. Out of such guilt, they often aggressively display their attachment to the roots- that they are very proud of their country and their religion. They are keen to have a leader who will try and make India important in the eyes of the first world, but will also stand for traditional Indian culture and traditions. NaMo is almost designed to fit these desires, and no wonder they are over-the-top in cheering him. They are mostly unaware of the poverty and inequality in India. In their eyes, anyone opposing rapid industrialization or pointing out the maladies in any Indian tradition is an enemy, and they will do their utmost to humiliate and isolate him. During the 2014 elections, many NRIs actually quit their jobs and came over to India to help the election campaigns of NaMo and IPP. Admittedly, some NRIs have quite different political views- some are more interested in ridding India of corruption and other problems rather than showing off to the world. On the other hand, those NRIs who are not much into politics and are more interested in enjoying the normal pleasures of life, are often derided or made fun of by these “politically aroused” NRIs, especially the nationalist right-wingers. They try to show off to their countrymen that they are standing up for their country, religion, tradition and culture, while others have forgotten these and enjoying the ugly American culture!

The current batches of twenty-somethings have gone through massive changes over the last few years. It is true that many have shed their apathy and hedonism, and are more interested in making a difference for their country. But they are outraged and angry, and intolerant of opposition. They have become strongly polarized. They do not have the patience or the broadness of mind to examine and understand various aspects of the complex problems of the country, but want to jump forward. Their main medium is the internet, and they are overzealous in making their presence felt there. The question arises- how are these changes going to affect our country and society in the near future? Will there actually be any improvements, or will there only be increased polarization and intolerance? Will the next batch of twenty-somethings be even more angry and polarized, or will they learn to see things more holistically? Or will they just give up, and go back to hedonist enjoyment? And is that really such a bad thing after all?